Real-Time Interbank Exposure Governance
Keywords:
Event-Driven Research Intelligence, Real-Time Risk Assessment, Complex Network Analysis, Adaptive Control Systems, Market Crisis Detection, Credit Risk Mapping, Stress Testing, Event-Driven Architecture, Financial Network Analytics, Decision Intelligence.Abstract
The growing volume of published research means that many journal articles go largely unnoticed, become quickly outdated, or fail to generate enough citations to justify continued funding — a problem compounded by periodic funding shortfalls and controversies around securitized financial instruments. In response, experts have called for financing models that are timely, precise, and demand-driven, structured around real-time events rather than static funding cycles, in order to reduce reliance on taxpayer-funded bailouts.
Current market structures largely rely on anonymous limit-order books, where dealers generate profit from the costs of risk, liquidity, opacity, and time. This dynamic draws in pension and guarantee funds seeking low-cost access to trade reserves for securities. However, detecting and responding to market crises in real time — including credit-risk mapping and stress testing — remains a significant technical challenge.
Complex-network analysis offers one path forward: studies of coordination within large institutional networks suggest that event-driven structures can support more responsive decision-making. Building on adaptive models of limit-order-book trading, recent work on real-time, intelligent, event-driven control systems suggests that market operations more broadly could benefit from simplified event-driven dynamics. We therefore propose a two-speed event-driven framework that governs feedback and event consistency at both the decision-control-action level and the broader structural-performance level.
References
1. Capponi, A., Sun, X., & Yao, D. D. (2020). A dynamic network model of interbank lending—Systemic risk and liquidity provisioning. Mathematics of Operations Research, 45(3), 1127–1152.
2. Liu, A., Paddrik, M., Yang, S. Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Interbank contagion: An agent-based model approach to endogenously formed networks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 112, Article 105191.
3. Kolla, S. K. (2021). Adaptive Graph-Based Framework for Secure and Efficient Distributed Data Processing. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications (JoCAAA), 29(6), 1519-1523.
4. Gandica, Y., Béreau, S., & Gnabo, J.-Y. (2020). A multilevel analysis of financial institutions’ systemic exposure from local and system-wide information. Scientific Reports, 10, Article 17657.
5. Matousek, R., & Rummel, O. (2020). Cross-border interbank contagion risk analysis: Evidence from selected emerging and less-developed economies in the Asia-Pacific region. Cambridge University Press.
6. Jackson, M. O., & Pernoud, A. (2021). Systemic risk in financial networks: A survey. Annual Review of Economics, 13, 171–202.
7. Sasidhar Reddy Mondeddula. (2022). AI-Driven Fraud Detection Using Ensemble Machine Learning for Secure Digital Banking Transactions. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 10(3s), 597–605. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8515
8. Cuba, W., Rodriguez-Martinez, A., Chavez, D. A., Caccioli, F., & Martinez-Jaramillo, S. (2021). A network characterization of the interbank exposures in Peru. Latin American Journal of Central Banking, 2(3), Article 100035.
9. Roncoroni, A., Battiston, S., D’Errico, M., Hałaj, G., & Kok, C. (2021). Interconnected banks and systemically important exposures. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 133, Article 104266.
10. Macchiati, V., Brandi, G., Di Matteo, T., Paolotti, D., Caldarelli, G., & Cimini, G. (2022). Systemic liquidity contagion in the European interbank market. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 17, 443–474.
11. Mashetty, S., & Mukesh, A. (2022). Application of Machine Learning in Loan Default Forecasting. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Machine Learning, 3(4), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9262.IJAIDSML-V3I4P114
12. Davydov, D., Vähämaa, S., & Yasar, S. (2021). Bank liquidity creation and systemic risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 123, Article 106031.
13. Li, Z., & Lai, R. N. (2022). Interbank borrowing and bank liquidity risk. Journal of Financial Research, 45(1), 53–91.
14. Das, S. R., Mitchener, K. J., & Vossmeyer, A. (2022). Bank regulation, network topology, and systemic risk: Evidence from the Great Depression. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 54(5), 1261–1312.
15. Reddy, V. A. R. (2022). Data-Driven Healthcare Operations: Architecting Unified Member, Provider, and Claims Intelligence Platforms. International Journal of Science, Research and Technology, 5(5), 8511-8521.
16. Eboli, M., Ozel, B., Teglio, A., & Toto, A. (2023). Connectivity, centralisation and ‘robustness-yet-fragility’ of interbank networks. Annals of Finance, 19, 169–200.
17. Reale, J. (2022). Interbank market and funding liquidity risk in a stock-flow consistent model. Metroeconomica, 73(3), 734–769.
18. Lartey, T., James, G. A., & Danso, A. (2021). Interbank funding, bank risk exposure and performance in the UK: A three-stage network DEA approach. International Review of Financial Analysis, 75, Article 101753.
19. Ellul, A., & Kim, D. (2022). Counterparty choice, bank interconnectedness, and bank risk-taking. Office of Financial Research Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 22-06.
20. Rajesh Reddy Ellenki. (2022). Predictive Demand Forecasting Framework for Adaptive Retail Inventory Planning . International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 10(2s), 412–418. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8543
21. Jović, Ž., & Lutovac Đaković, M. (2022). Interbank network as a channel of credit contagion in banks: Is moral hazard transferable? Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 11(3).
22. Li, Z., & Liu, X. (2022). How does risk information dissemination affect risk contagion in the interbank market? PLOS ONE, 17(7), Article e0270482.
23. Eboli, M., Ozel, B., & Teglio, A. (2022). Connectivity and systemic risk in interbank networks. Annals of Finance.
24. Capponi, A., Sun, X., & Yao, D. D. (2020). Dynamic network modeling of interbank liquidity and systemic risk. Mathematics of Operations Research, 45(3), 1127–1152.
25. Gandica, Y., Béreau, S., & Gnabo, J.-Y. (2020). Systemic exposure and financial network information. Scientific Reports, 10, Article 17657.
26. Macchiati, V., Brandi, G., Di Matteo, T., Paolotti, D., Caldarelli, G., & Cimini, G. (2022). Liquidity contagion in interbank networks. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 17, 443–474.
27. Gadi, A. (2020). The Role of Digital Twins in Automotive R&D for Rapid Prototyping and System Integration. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication.
28. Li, Z., & Lai, R. N. (2022). Interbank lending and liquidity risk management. Journal of Financial Research, 45(1), 53–91.
29. Roncoroni, A., Battiston, S., D’Errico, M., Hałaj, G., & Kok, C. (2021). Interconnectedness and systemically important bank exposures. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 133, Article 104266.
30. Jackson, M. O., & Pernoud, A. (2021). Systemic risk and financial network interconnectedness. Annual Review of Economics, 13, 171–202.
31. Liu, A., Paddrik, M., Yang, S. Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Interbank contagion and network formation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 112, Article 105191.
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
None
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 James Robertson (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
