Event-Driven Coordination of Financial Risk Across Institutions
Keywords:
Event-Driven Research Intelligence, Real-Time Risk Assessment, Complex Network Analysis, Adaptive Control Systems, Market Crisis Detection, Credit Risk Mapping, Stress Testing, Event-Driven Architecture, Financial Network Analytics, Decision Intelligence.Abstract
The volume of published academic research continues to grow, yet a significant proportion of journal articles receive little attention, quickly become outdated, or fail to generate enough citations to justify the funding invested in them. This problem has been compounded by institutional funding crises and scandals linked to securitization practices. In response, experts have called for financing models that are timely, precise, real-time, and demand-driven—structured around discrete events—to help prevent the need for large-scale taxpayer bailouts.
At present, financial market activity is largely governed by anonymous limit-order trading, in which dealers generate profits by pricing in risk, liquidity constraints, opacity, and time-related costs before taxation. As a result, low-cost fee structures continue to attract pension funds and guarantee funds, which exchange reserves for securities through these systems.
Detecting, incorporating, and responding to market crises in real time requires timely assessment of risk, resources, and clearing processes; however, real-time credit-risk mapping and stress testing remain largely unattainable with current methods. That said, complex-network analysis—drawing on insights from research into educational networks and outcomes—suggests that coordination built around discrete, elementary events may offer a viable path forward. Existing micro-level market models have introduced adaptive adjustments to limit-order trading systems, and findings from Real-Time Intelligent Event-Driven Adaptive Research Control suggest that corporate operations more broadly could benefit from simple event-driven dynamics. Building on this, the study proposes a two-speed, event-driven framework for selective feedback that defines event consistency at both the decision-control-action level and the structural-performance level.
References
1. Abduraimova, K. (2022). Contagion and tail risk in complex financial networks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 143, Article 106560.
2. Acedański, J., & Karkowska, R. (2022). Instability spillovers in the banking sector: A spatial econometrics approach. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 62, Article 101694.
3. Agénor, P.-R., & Pereira da Silva, L. A. (2022). Financial spillovers, spillbacks, and the scope for international macroprudential policy coordination. International Economics and Economic Policy, 19, 79–127.
4. Gorle, R. (2023). Machine Learning-Based Access Risk Detection in Cloud Identity and Access Management Systems. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 241-252.
5. Ahelegbey, D. F., Giudici, P., & Hashem, S. Q. (2021). Network VAR models to measure financial contagion. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 55, Article 101318.
6. Ando, T., Greenwood-Nimmo, M., & Shin, Y. (2022). Quantile connectedness: Modeling tail behavior in the topology of financial networks. Management Science, 68(4), 2401–2431.
7. Andrieș, A. M., Ongena, S., Sprincean, N., & Tunaru, R. (2022). Risk spillovers and interconnectedness between systemically important institutions. Journal of Financial Stability, 58, Article 100963.
8. Mashetty, S., & Mukesh, A. (2022). Application of Machine Learning in Loan Default Forecasting. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Machine Learning, 3(4), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9262.IJAIDSML-V3I4P114
9. Bian, Y. (P.), Wang, Y., & Xu, L. (2020). Systemic risk contagion in reconstructed financial credit network within banking and firm sectors on DebtRank based model. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2020, Article 8885657.
10. Borochin, P., & Rush, S. (2022). Information networks in the financial sector and systemic risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 134, Article 106327.
11. Rajesh Reddy Ellenki. (2022). Predictive Demand Forecasting Framework for Adaptive Retail Inventory Planning . International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 10(2s), 412–418. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8543
12. Cerqueti, R., Cinelli, M., Ferraro, G., & Iovanella, A. (2022). Financial interbanking networks resilience under shocks propagation. Annals of Operations Research.
13. Chen, Y.-N. (2022). Bank interconnectedness and financial stability: The role of bank capital. Journal of Financial Stability, 61, Article 101019.
14. Elliott, M., Georg, C.-P., & Hazell, J. (2021). Systemic risk shifting in financial networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 191, Article 105157.
15. Kolla, S. K. (2021). Adaptive Graph-Based Framework for Secure and Efficient Distributed Data Processing. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications (JoCAAA), 29(6), 1519-1523.
16. Gençay, R., Pang, H., Tseng, M. C., & Xue, Y. (2020). Contagion in a network of heterogeneous banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 111, Article 105725.
17. Jackson, M. O., & Pernoud, A. (2021). Systemic risk in financial networks: A survey. Annual Review of Economics, 13, 171–202.
18. Sasidhar Reddy Mondeddula. (2022). AI-Driven Fraud Detection Using Ensemble Machine Learning for Secure Digital Banking Transactions. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 10(3s), 597–605. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8515
19. Liu, A., Paddrik, M., Yang, S. Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Interbank contagion: An agent-based model approach to endogenously formed networks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 112, Article 105191.
20. Ma, J. L., Zhu, S. S., & Wu, Y. (2021). Joint effects of the liability network and portfolio overlapping on systemic financial risk: Contagion and rescue. Quantitative Finance, 21(5), 753–770.
21. Macchiati, V., Brandi, G., Di Matteo, T., Paolotti, D., Caldarelli, G., & Cimini, G. (2022). Systemic liquidity contagion in the European interbank market. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 17, 443–474.
22. Gadi, A. (2020). The Role of Digital Twins in Automotive R&D for Rapid Prototyping and System Integration. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication.
23. Roncoroni, A., Battiston, S., D’Errico, M., Hałaj, G., & Kok, C. (2021). Interconnected banks and systemically important exposures. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 133, Article 104266.
24. So, M. K. P., Chan, L. S. H., & Chu, A. M. Y. (2021). Financial network connectedness and systemic risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 28, 649–665.
25. Veraart, L. A. M. (2020). Distress and default contagion in financial networks. Mathematical Finance, 30(3), 705–737.
26. Kolla, S. K. (2021). Adaptive Graph-Based Framework for Secure and Efficient Distributed Data Processing. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications (JoCAAA), 29(6), 1519-1523.
27. Wang, G.-J., Yi, S., Xie, C., & Stanley, H. E. (2021). Multilayer information spillover networks: Measuring interconnectedness of financial institutions. Quantitative Finance, 21(7), 1163–1185.
28. Xie, Y., Jiao, F., Li, S., Liu, Q., & Tse, Y. (2022). Systemic risk in financial institutions: A multiplex network approach. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 73, Article 101752.
29. Lin, J., & coauthors. (2022). Interbank contagion risk in China under an ABM approach for network formation. European Financial Management.
30. Chen, H., Wang, T., & Yao, D. D. (2021). Financial network and systemic risk—A dynamic model. Production and Operations Management.
31. Reddy, V. A. R. (2022). Data-Driven Healthcare Operations: Architecting Unified Member, Provider, and Claims Intelligence Platforms. International Journal of Science, Research and Technology, 5(5), 8511-8521.
32. Ellul, A., & Kim, D. (2022). Counterparty choice, bank interconnectedness, and bank risk-taking. Office of Financial Research Working Paper No. 22-06.
33. (2022). Quantifying interconnectedness and centrality ranking among financial institutions with TVP-VAR framework. Published journal article.
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
The results are based on a simulated multi-institution exposure stream. No datasets are publicly available.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alexander Miller (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
