Generative Models and DevOps for Insurance Claims

Authors

  • Vinod Battapothu Author
    Competing Interests

    AI,ML

Keywords:

Insurance intelligence; fraud detection; generative modeling; anomaly signal; supervised learning; DevOps; domain-serving architecture; feedback loop; risk; compliance.

Abstract

Novel AI applications are transforming insurance operations from passive monitoring toward intelligent, proactive services, with fraud detection as a core focus. The rapid growth of generative AI has introduced new capabilities that allow organizations to shift from largely reactive fraud detection to a proactive posture. Generative models can synthesize fraud-related data signals to augment existing training datasets, improving detection performance — provided the underlying data patterns are well-suited to generating realistic synthetic samples. Using demographic, health, and police-report data as a foundation, organizations can synthesize convincing anomaly signals representative of insurance fraud. Integrating these synthetic signals into the fraud-detection pipeline is supported by DevOps practices spanning data engineering, continuous integration/continuous delivery, governance, and lifecycle management. The proposed approach has been applied operationally across property and casualty, health, and auto insurance lines.

Generating data signals that closely mirror actual fraud patterns can help close critical training gaps in detection models. Beyond detection, these synthetic samples offer business value as adversarial test cases and as inputs for automated explainability checks. This kind of comprehensive utility can be realized at scale and over time, without the friction typically associated with data ownership. The resulting architecture is flexible enough to generate signals for any dimension of fraud. Connecting directly into systems of record provides a pragmatic, scalable, and operational path to achieving this. Careful attention to latency tolerance and data governance ensures that the synthesis process remains feasible, useful, and compliant.

References

1. Aslam, F., Hunjra, A. I., Ftiti, Z., Louhichi, W., & Shams, T. (2022). Insurance fraud detection: Evidence from artificial intelligence and machine learning. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101744.

2. Debener, J., Heinke, V., & Kriebel, J. (2023). Detecting insurance fraud using supervised and unsupervised machine learning. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 90(3), 743–768.

3. Hernández-Orallo, J., Martínez-Plumed, F., Gómez, E., & T. T. (2021). Machine learning for insurance: Applications, challenges, and opportunities. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54, 1–28.

4. Urunkar, A., Khot, A., Bhat, R., & Mudegol, N. L. (2022). Fraud detection and analysis for insurance claim using machine learning. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Informatics, Communication and Energy Systems (SPICES).

5. Kolla, S. H., & Peddi, R. K. (2024). Designing Governance-Aligned GenAI Pipelines Using Small Language Models for Enterprise Workflow Intelligence. International Journal of Science, Research and Technology, 7(6), 13256-13268.

6. Kumaraswamy, N., Markey, M. K., Barner, J. C., & Rascati, K. (2022). Feature engineering to detect fraud using healthcare claims data. Expert Systems with Applications, 210, 118433.

7. Settipalli, L., & Gangadharan, G. R. (2023). WMTDBC: An unsupervised multivariate analysis model for fraud detection in health insurance claims. Expert Systems with Applications, 215, 119259.

8. Nabrawi, E., & Alanazi, A. (2023). Fraud detection in healthcare insurance claims using machine learning. Risks, 11(9), 160.

9. Hancock, J. T., Bauder, R. A., Wang, H., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2023). Explainable machine learning models for Medicare fraud detection. Journal of Big Data, 10, 154.

10. Zhang, W., Shi, J., Wang, X., & Wynn, H. (2023). AI-powered decision-making in facilitating insurance claim dispute resolution. Annals of Operations Research.

11. Kumaraswamy, N., Ekin, T., Park, C., Markey, M. K., Barner, J. C., & Rascati, K. (2024). Using a Bayesian belief network to detect healthcare fraud. Expert Systems with Applications, 238, 122241.

12. Vorobyev, I. (2024). Fraud risk assessment in car insurance using claims graph features in machine learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 249, 124109.

13. Mattaparthi, R. (2023). Deep Learning-Driven Combustion Anomaly Detection in Diesel Powertrains: A Multi-Sensor Fusion Approach for Real-Time ECM Adaptation. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11, 1084.

14. Kaya, H. (2024). Riskified fraud detection using machine learning: Insurance claims. Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi İşletme ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 39–56.

15. Sutardiman, M., Arditya, D. A., & Suroso, J. S. (2024). Risk assessment and detection of fraudulent claims in insurance systems with machine learning approaches. Sebatik, 28(2).

16. Jaiswal, R., Gupta, S., & Tiwari, A. K. (2024). Big data and machine learning-based decision support system to reshape the vaticination of insurance claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 207, 123829.

17. Lui, S. J., Xiang, C., & Krishnaswamy, S. (2024). KAMEL: Knowledge aware medical entity linkage to automate health insurance claims processing. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38(21), 22797–22805.

18. Eling, M., Nuessle, D., & Staubli, J. (2022). The impact of artificial intelligence along the insurance value chain and on the insurability of risks. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice, 47, 205–241.

19. Mahadevan, S. (2024). Clouding the Future: Innovating Towards Net-Zero Emissions. International Journal of Computing and Engineering, 6(2), 17-23.

20. Banh, L., & Strobel, G. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 33, 63.

21. Kumar, P. (2024). Large language models (LLMs): Survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57, 260.

22. Schneider, J. (2024). Explainable generative AI (GenXAI): A survey, conceptualization, and research agenda. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57, 289.

23. Hagos, D. H., Battle, R., & Rawat, D. B. (2024). Recent advances in generative AI and large language models: Current status, challenges, and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 5(12), 5873–5893.

24. Saharia, C., Chan, W., Saxena, S., Li, L., Whang, J., Denton, E., Ghasemipour, S. K. S., Ayan, B. K., Salimans, T., Ho, J., Fleet, D. J., & Norouzi, M. (2022). Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35.

25. Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10684–10695.

26. Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., Schulman, J., Hilton, J., Kelton, F., Miller, L., Simens, M., Askell, A., Welinder, P., Christiano, P. F., Leike, J., & Lowe, R. (2022). Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35.

27. Reddy, V. A. R. (2023). Predictive Healthcare Administration Using Advanced Payer Analytics and Population Health Data Engineering. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science & Technology (IJARCST), 6(2), 7967-7978.

28. Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., Chi, E. H., Hashimoto, T., Vinyals, O., Liang, P., Dean, J., & Fedus, W. (2022). Emergent abilities of large language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research.

29. OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv.

30. Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., Brynjolfsson, E., Buch, S., Card, D., Castellon, R., Chatterji, N., Chen, A., Creel, K., Davis, J. Q., Demszky, D., … Liang, P. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv.

31. Mäkinen, S., Skogström, H., Laaksonen, E., & Mikkonen, T. (2021). Who needs MLOps: What data scientists seek to accomplish and how can MLOps help? In 2021 IEEE/ACM 1st Workshop on AI Engineering—Software Engineering for AI (WAIN), 109–112.

32. Granlund, T., Kopponen, A., Stirbu, V. A., Myllyaho, L., & Mikkonen, T. (2021). MLOps challenges in multi-organization setup: Experiences from two real-world cases. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 1st Workshop on AI Engineering—Software Engineering for AI (WAIN).

33. Mahadevan, S. (2024). Intelligent Serverless Process Automation for Scalable Cloud Operations and Dynamic Resource Optimization. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications (JoCAAA), 33(06), 4207-4221.

34. Renggli, C., Rimanic, L., Gürel, N. M., Karlas, B., Wu, W., & Zhang, C. (2021). A data quality-driven view of MLOps. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 44(1), 11–23.

35. Testi, M., Ballabio, M., Frontoni, E., Iannello, G., Moccia, S., Soda, P., & Vessio, G. (2022). MLOps: A taxonomy and a methodology. IEEE Access, 10, 63606–63618.

36. Hewage, N., & Meedeniya, D. (2022). Machine learning operations: A survey on MLOps tool support. arXiv.

37. Garousi, V., Felderer, M., & Mäntylä, M. V. (2022). Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 106840.

38. Kreuzberger, D., Kühl, N., & Hirschl, S. (2023). Machine learning operations (MLOps): Overview, definition, and architecture. IEEE Access, 11, 31866–31879.

39. Loganathan, R., & Kolla, S. H. (2024). Harnessing generative AI for adaptive risk policy generation in multi-regulatory data center environments. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 15(3), 505-515.

40. Díaz-de-Arcaya, J., Torre-Bastida, A. I., Zárate, G., Miñón, R., & Almeida, A. (2024). A joint study of the challenges, opportunities, and roadmap of MLOps and AIOps: A systematic survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(4), Article 84.

41. Wazir, S., Kashyap, G. S., & Saxena, P. (2023). MLOps: A review. arXiv.

Additional Files

Published

2025-02-16

Data Availability Statement

No new datasets were generated or analyzed in this study.

How to Cite

Generative Models and DevOps for Insurance Claims. (2025). The American Journal of Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (AJAAI), 3(01). https://ajaaai.org/index.php/ajaai/article/view/48

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 56

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.