AI-Driven Data Governance for Regulatory Reporting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22173135Keywords:
AI-Driven Data Governance, Regulatory-Ready Reporting, Financial Compliance Automation, Data Lineage and Provenance, Metadata Management Systems, Regulation Language Adapters, NLP for Policy Extraction, Machine Learning–Based Data Quality Monitoring, Integrated Governance Frameworks, Regulatory Risk Management, Audit and Compliance Automation, End-to-End Data Flow Control, Holistic Risk Assessment, Supervisory Stress Testing, Credit Risk Evaluation, Capital Adequacy Analytics, Governance Process Mapping, Enterprise Data Controls, Regulatory Infrastructure Modernization, Intelligent Compliance Architectures.Abstract
Data governance strategies based on artificial intelligence are urgently needed to meet financial regulations that require authorities to track and control transactions and flows. Recent events have demonstrated the severe consequences when such regulations are not fulfilled. AI technologies can help close the gap between the high level of regulatory risk and the maturity of compliance and audit governance. Implementing AI techniques in data governance to improve regulatory-ready reporting, audit, and compliance can be mapped to various frameworks. The necessary components and connections can be expressed through the lenses of data lineage and provenance, metadata management and regulation language adapters, natural language processing systems for extracting governance policies from natural language documents, and machine-learning models for monitoring data quality.
New regulatory imperatives are piling pressure on institutions that already run overloaded production systems. High levels of regulatory risk require institutions to secure and map their governance processes and controls. Most of the recent regulatory breaches can be traced to poor data quality, weak data flows, and insufficient controls. Data sources and flows are seldom documented, and no system manages data quality in an integrated way. Regulatory stress tests have also led supervisory authorities to seek holistic risk evaluations instead of using the usual isolated pillar assessments. The aim is to have a clear view of the institution's credit risk in order to assess capital needs in extreme scenarios. For many institutions, such assessments require a monumental amount of additional infrastructure and resources because the required reporting does not flow naturally from their business-as-usual processes.
References
1. Borgogno, O., & Zangrandi, M. S. (2021). Data governance and the regulation of the platform economy. Questioni di Economia e Finanza, 652.
2. Chen, J. (2021). Ontology drift is a challenge for explainable data governance. arXiv.
3. Kolla, S. H. (2023). Large Language Model-Driven Enterprise Service Intelligence for Digital Workflow Transformation. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 6(1), 8380-8391.
4. Karkošková, S. (2023). Data governance model to enhance data quality in financial institutions. Information Systems Management, 40(1), 90–110.
5. Kothandapani, H. P. (2022). Optimizing financial data governance for improved risk management and regulatory reporting in data lakes. International Journal of Applied Machine Learning and Computational Intelligence, 12(4), 41–63.
6. Kolla, S. K., & Reddy, V. A. R. (2023). Deep Learning Architectures For Multimodal Medical Data Integration. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 248–260.
7. Prakash, S., Venkatasubbu, S., & Konidena, B. K. (2023). From burden to advantage: Leveraging AI/ML for regulatory reporting in US banking. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 1(1), 176–183.
8. Prakash, S., Venkatasubbu, S., & Konidena, B. K. (2023). Unlocking insights: AI/ML applications in regulatory reporting for US banks. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 1(1), 177–184.
9. Prakash, S., Venkatasubbu, S., & Konidena, B. K. (2023). Streamlining regulatory reporting in US banking: A deep dive into AI/ML solutions. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 1(1), 166–175.
10. Tillu, R., Muthusubramanian, M., & Periyasamy, V. (2023). Transforming regulatory reporting with AI/ML: Strategies for compliance and efficiency. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 2(1), 145–157.
11. Bandi, V. D. V. K. (2023, November). Production-Grade Machine Learning Pipelines For Healthcare Predictive Analytics. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 189–205.
12. Tillu, R., Muthusubramanian, M., & Periyasamy, V. (2023). From data to compliance: The role of AI/ML in optimizing regulatory reporting processes. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 2(3), 391–399.
13. Bagwe, C. (2023). Use of AI to improve regulatory reporting accuracy and efficiency. International Journal of Finance.
14. Micheler, E., & Whaley, R. (2023). Data access technologies and the “new governance” techniques of financial regulation. Journal of Financial Regulation, 9(2), 225–258.
15. Davuluri, P. S. L. N. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence into event-driven financial crime compliance platforms. International Journal of Finance, 36(6), 707-736.
16. Financial Stability Board. (2021). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services: Market developments and financial stability implications. Financial Stability Board.
17. Bank for International Settlements. (2021). Big data and machine learning in central banking. Bank for International Settlements.
18. Bank for International Settlements. (2022). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services: Regulatory implications and supervisory approaches. Bank for International Settlements.
19. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2021). Principles for operational resilience. Bank for International Settlements.
20. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2022). Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. Bank for International Settlements.
21. Yandamuri, U. S. (2023). An Intelligent Analytics Framework Combining Big Data and Machine Learning for Business Forecasting. Zenodo.
22. European Banking Authority. (2021). Report on big data and advanced analytics. European Banking Authority.
23. European Banking Authority. (2022). Discussion paper on machine learning for internal ratings-based models. European Banking Authority.
24. European Central Bank. (2021). Guide on effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. European Central Bank.
25. Mangalampalli, B. M. Generative AI Applications In Healthcare Data Mart Design And Optimization.
26. European Central Bank. (2022). Supervisory priorities for the Single Supervisory Mechanism. European Central Bank.
27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). OECD digital economy outlook 2021. OECD Publishing.
28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). OECD digital economy outlook 2022. OECD Publishing.
29. World Bank. (2021). World development report 2021: Data for better lives. World Bank.
30. World Economic Forum. (2022). The future of data governance: Data policy and responsible data use. World Economic Forum.
31. International Organization for Standardization. (2021). ISO 8000-61:2021: Data quality—Part 61: Data quality management process reference model. International Organization for Standardization.
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
None
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tanja Schultz (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
